[ BOOK Into the Wild ] by Jon Krakauer – dedelicate.com
Have had the opportunity to do this to meOne shouldn t judge a life by its end or its duration but by its content Chris may have died young but his life certainly was a fulfilling one This book got me riveted in the tragic story of Chris McCandless a young man who left his family and friends abandoned most of his material possessions went to the Alaska wilderness and perished there The author does a great job of portraying McCandless complex personality through meticulous research based on interviews letters and journal entries The writing is so engaging that although it is already clear from the beginning how McCandless story would end I was hooked till the last page Krakauer only digresses when discussing his own high risk undertaking and those of ill fated adventurers similar to McCandless these parts offer comparison to McCandless character but I found myself getting impatient and wanting them to end uickly to return to the main story itself which is much compellingReaders have been divided with regard to this story Some admire McCandless daring and idealism some others say he was stupid reckless and arrogant enough to have gone to Alaska without sufficient preparation I think he was a human being with faults and merits but I have to admit I felt something stirring in me when I read this passage taken from a letter he wrote to a friend make a radical change in your lifestyle and begin to boldly do things which you may previously never have thought of doing or been too hesitant to attempt So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation because they are conditioned to a life of security conformity and conservation The very basic core of a man s living spirit is his passion for adventureThe passage resonates with me because my life has been filled with stagnation and inactivity I am the ueen of conventionalism I don t consider myself unhappy but I m always afraid of moving outside the comfort zone of expanding further than my own comfortable little shell I often don t exert myself to my best capabilities because halfhearted efforts seemed good enough When I read about McCandless I noticed that one of his admirable traits is if he wanted something he went out and did it He was not afraid of challenges the greater they are the better Jason Mraz says live high live mighty live righteously I think that was what McCandless did he lived up to his ideals One the other hand the greatest tragedy of McCandless life in my opinion was his conflicting feelings toward human intimacy and relationship He clashed with his parents and others who didn t share his beliefs to the point that he spurned humanity and sought nature and the wilderness instead But even during his solitary journeys he met a lot of people and connected with them touching their lives as well as his own His final odyssey in Alaska had probably made him realize than ever the raw need for companionship but he didn t survive that trip causing endless grief to his family So in the end if there is something I can take from McCandless story it is this message Be bold Get out there Do something But don t forget those who love you I now walk into the wild Christopher McCandless 1968 1992I live a life I suspect that is much like yours Wake up go to work come home eat dinner go to bed At the end of this weekly desert there might be a drink or ten to celebrate the victory over another five days of soul crushing drudgeryI am a desk jockey A paper pusher I mean that literally I sit in my office and when people peer inside they will see me moving a sheet of paper from one side to the other It looks to the untrained eye like valuable labor When I get the chance though I head to the mountains to the wild I love the away ness of these trips At the risk of sounding absurdly curmudgeonly I like getting away from the crush of humanity and I m sure the crush of humanity appreciates my temporary absence There was at time when my friends and I would head out west every summer We picked a destination isolated challenging packed the car and plunged into the wilderness We undertook silly risks because we were younger and we laughed at conseuences or at the possibility that there were conseuences Once a little later on we gathered around a campfire four of us and swore like characters from a young adult novel that we d always do this that we d always head out to the mountains together Then we got older My friends married they started having ids and the mountains became a memory a slideshow of pictures that showed up on the screen savers of our computers Friends with whom I d jumped off cliffs slid down glaciers and climbed rocks matured overnight into sober professionals husbands and fathers It was remarkable how age engendered caution and suelched the desire for adventure That was my mindset when I picked up Into the Wild Jon Krakauer s classic is to put it mildly a polarizing book Based on the people I ve surveyed I ve found that you either love it or you hate it and whether you love it or hate it will be determined by what you think about Christopher McCandless the young man at the center of Into the Wild You will be taken in by Chris s literate philosophical iconoclastic boundary pushing vagabondism Or you will be sickened by his selfishness his self pity and the way he left a shattered family in his wake Either way you will have a vivid responseUpon graduating from Emory University and instead of going on to law school which was my choice McCandless gave away 25000 to charity and began his life as a tramp or hobo as they sometimes like to be called I was in sixth grade when McCandless walked into the Alaskan wilderness and never returned He was 24 The power of Into the Wild is directly attributable to Krakauer s empathy for his subject Krakauer is a solid adventure writer but he s not a prose stylist Rather he uses his own life experiences to connect with Chris on a very intimate personal level He does not attempt any faux objectivity that is often the hallmark of serious serious journalism Instead Krakauer admits straight up that he saw his younger self in Chris with the exception that Krakauer survived his youth while Chris did not For instance there is an autobiographical section in Into the Wild where Krakauer tells his story about climbing the Devil s Thumb This could easily have been a self serving digression but Krakauer uses that experience and the vividness of his memory to explore the the compulsions that drove Chris McCandless to follow his uniue path to his destiny I think Chris in his own way was a towering figure he was the person I would like to be if I had guts and less excuses He was a smart The Wild Queen (Young Royals, kid a college grad who came from money His parents were messed up but really whose parents aren t After college instead of going to law school don t go to law school by the way he gave away 25000 burned his credit cards and set out to see the west Whatever else you call him you can t call him a poser Like everyone he had his share of dreams and demons and he set out to follow his dreams and fight his demons There s something to be said for what he put his parent through Still the world forces us to be our own person He went forward the best way henew how defining himself along the way The tragedy of course is that the lessons he learned about the value of friends and family he learned too late I don t really need to defend Chris Krakauer does that He is unabashedly in his corner defending his choices his skills his desire to go alone to the far places like John Muir before him Chris McCandless was himself fully and completely which is saying a lot in this day and age Or any day and age He was part adventurer part philosopher and part monk the monk part fascinates Krakauer who spends a lot of time wondering whether Chris died a virgin I suppose a brief note on the movie directed by Sean Penn is in order While I found it poetic and inspiring the movie focuses too much on Chris s effect on the various people he meets on his journeys In a way Chris becomes some Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality kind of wandering apostle healing and helping those he meets along his path before he dies a martyr s death in Alaska a vision from a Don Maclean song the world was never meant for one as beautiful as you The book on the other handeeps Chris firmly grounded as a human being Krakauer admires Chris to be sure but he does not neglect the warts However Krakauer sharply dismisses those armchair psychiatrists who want to diagnose Chris with a mental disorder I m glad he does I think it s saying soemething about the conformity of our society that anyone who bucks the trend he gave up law school is called mad In the end Chris was one of those rare people who wanted to Learning and Development know the world intimately and in the process of discovering those secrets wasilled by that same world Maybe there was something uixotic or foolish in his uest maybe he should have taken a job taken a wife found a safe desk behind which to grow old Or maybe there is something foolish in us to believe that we can outlive the world with our caution Overall I was pretty disappointed with this book The genesis of the book was an in depth magazine article and I suspect that the article was superb But I just don t think there s enough here to warrant an entire book As evidence I point to several lengthy chapters that have nothing to do with the underlying story they discuss other people who have gone into the wild and surprisingly Krakauer includes a whole chapter about himselfMy other problem is that I found myself unable to identify or empathize with the central character here I think that Chris McCandless was not much than a privileged entitled selfish and undeniably intelligent person who threw everything away and nearly destroyed his family for reasons that weren t any clearer by the end of the book than they were at the beginning I worried far about his parents and his sister who he called his best friend than I did about himI ended up finishing the book by skimming the last 13 or maybe even the last 12 I almost gave this only 1 star but decided to go with 2 because I want to give Krakauer the benefit of the doubt it s a well written book I just don t think it needed to be written at all We are all heroes to ourselves McCandless was Krakauer is This doesn t vary All that varies is how we define heroism and how much or how little we are prepared to do to for that stanceIn order to get people usually young men to sacrifice their lives we tell them of those that went before and tell them they were heroes who died for their countries died for their principles died even for their dreams Impractical dreams that are the province of the young And those who would be heroes never concern themselves with the practical that is far too mundane it is for others to take care of those details McCandless dream of heroism was to survive entirely alone and entirely off the land at the ends of the earth It didn t include the practicality of learning about the wild foods he might forage in that area or how he might survive in extreme weather conditions or even exactly where his place of solitude was situated so that when he sought succour at the end he didn t even now how close it really was The final photograph he took of himself is of a wasted face gaunt but beautiful with the shining eyes of one who has lived his dream and is satisfied Then he died This book is a wonderful cautionary tale I will probably read it again with my daughter when she is old enough to discuss it Unfortunately. Body was found in an abandoned bus in the Alaskan wilderness in 1992 Described by friends and relatives as smart literate compassionate and funny did McCandless simply read too much Thoreau and Jack London and lose sight of the dan.
Jon Krakauer Ì 0 Review
My grandfather not an Alaskan but an experienced outdoorsman would have tied this id to a tree and let the bears play tetherball with himA small part of me appreciates the effort Krakauer put into researching this book A much bigger part of me is completely disgusted both with McCandless himself and with Krakauer s mindless adoration of him Krakauer pulls out all the stops to make McCandless look like a phenomenon and seems to agree with McCandless that the world should have handed itself to him on a silver salver because he was just so darned special We re told he was brilliant independent funny Mastering Gephi Network Visualization kind musical athletic visionary talented Can you see the halo Unfortunately the impression that comes across is of a snotty adolescent who has never seriously thought of anyone but himself and is used to getting by on charm and flippancy rather than making good use of his considerable gifts and I do not doubt that he was gifted The conflicting aspects of his personality don t sound uirky they sound devious and self servingKrakauer tries half heartedly to disguise his fascination but his admissions that McCandless was a clueless young hothead sound insincere he has to say it to sound credible to his readers who are less smitten Krakauer makes an apt comparison between himself as an idealistic and foolhardy young man and McCandless and then dismisses himself because he didn t have McCandless intellect This sounds utterly bogus after all we have been told about McCandless foolish mistakes and the obvious fact that Krakauer is not stupid Two chapters that could have provided some insight into his hero are wasted because Krakauer sounds like a religious fanatic with McCandless as his unknowable God and Krakauer as the I m not worthy followerMcCandless and Everett Ruess overconfidence speaks to a fascination with nature but not a respect for it Courage is not the same as notnowing when we ought to have a healthy degree of fear Instead McCandless arrogantly drives his car into the habitat of an endangered species of poppy He butchers a moose wasting the life of a beautiful and well adapted animal because he could not be bothered to learn ahead of time how to preserve itThis was not a tragedy this was inevitable I don t believe he was schizophrenic or suicidal Bipolar or ADD maybe His own friends readily admitted that he had a lot of enthusiasm but little common sense and didn t The Canadian Regime know much outside of academia There are so many glaring outdoorsmanship errors made in the first two chapter that even I was cringingI write this with full admission that I am not much of an outdoorsperson However I don t believe for a minute that he lasted longer than most of us would have or that at least he tried it as so many of his fans insist I wouldn t try it not because I m scared but because I can tell from here that ten pounds of rice and no preparation is a recipe for failure I don t need to try it and if I did I d want to live to get something out of it Lots of other people have gone into the wilderness and come out just fine because theynew the magnitude of their own insignificance and planned aheadI m not jealous of his alleged brilliance either I was accepted to Emory And the University of Chicago And a couple of other amply respected schools Lots of people are Big deal1 His bourgeois status made his adventure possible in the first place He had money to pay his college tuition the rest of us graduated and went to work to pay off our loans He also had the gall to complain about his parents offers to help him out which smacks of a Testing Aircraft, Exploring Space kid given so much that he doesn tnow how fortunate he isFurther living with nothing by choice is very different from living with nothing because you have no alternative Though I m sure he would have denied it McCandless had the option of going back to his affluent life if he had wanted to or if he had had to in an emergency Maybe it would have nocked his self image for a loop but he would have been sheltered fed and nursed back to health A lot of people live in poverty without that safety net 2 Now is not the time to be sueamish about illing animals Hint There are no vegetarian Aleut This guy was a history and anthropology major I learned in anthro that you can eat plants and lean protein until you burst and still starve to death if you aren t getting enough calories It s very difficult to feed yourself if you re alone and don t have a lot of practice at it3 If he got this idea from Thoreau and London he wasn t reading very carefully McCandless should have read less Thoreau and Donner Party London s Alaskan experience was during the Klondike Gold Rush when he had plenty of help from others Thoreau lived in a cabin on the edge of town a mile and a half from the family home He was not in the wilderness Further Thoreau s civil disobedience was a protest against the Mexican War and slavery not a petty defiance of matters of public safety such as mandatory car insurance McCandless was a rebel without a cause4 Book smart can t save you now Success only learning does not work Krakauer goes into raptures about McCandless education and intelligence to demonstrate the supposed tragedy of his loss Nice brain gymnastics but apples to oranges when what you need is practical nowledgeThis guy was idolized by some my college classmates most of whom were sheltered relatively wealthy urbanites They had the same vague and pathetic need for real experiences and arrogant expectation of success that comes from never having failed at anything in their lives5 For most of his trip McCandless was neither independent or self reliant He got lost in Mexico it would have been self reliant to get a map and take charge of his own navigation He didn t eat for days until somebody felt sorry for him and fed him Once he was in a situation where there was nobody to step in for him he died in this respect I disagree with Krakauer that McCandless was any different from Carl McCunn Even at that point he left a note on the door of the bus begging for rescueThe best and most independent outdoorsmen spend years learning Just because you were a superstar student and athlete doesn t mean you get to skip all the hard work I ve no doubt that McCandless was smart but he was mind bogglingly ignorant and inexperienced6 Why are these self discovery escapades always so self centered How about joining the Peace Corps Teaching in inner city schools Working in healthcare in a remote South Asian village If you re so disgusted with society why don t you do something to improve it rather than eeping all the enlightenment for yourself7 Nature is not your babysitter Nature doesn t care if you live or die It s survival of the fittest and humans compared to most animals are slow weak poorly armed poorly insulated have no stamina have poor senses of smell eyesight and hearing and are ill adapted to go without clean water and food for any length of time We are clearly meant to live in groups and use tools This guy didn t even bring an ax8 He was already controlled and tainted by society or else he would not have worked so hard to avoid it His anti society and anti materialism were as controlling of him as is the materialism of those who think they can find themselves by buying the right clothes or drug habit or SUV9 Unprepared people who set out on ill planned adventures and need to be rescued are jackasses A lot of other people better prepared better trained and sensible people such as park service volunteers and EMT s end up spending a lot of time and money and risking their own necks to save them McCandless spared everyone that trouble but I m sure there s a whole line of wannabes lined up to try it I hope they have to pay back every penny spent on their rescuesAnd Truth The bad news is that Truth is relative It doesn t exist in a vacuum What a waste In 1992 roughly around the same time Chris McCandless was living out his final days in the Alaskan wilderness I would have been enjoying the summer holidays before embarking on my final year at school contemplating the big wide world and what I was going to do with the rest of my life It wasn t until watching Sean Penn s film in 2008 I would learn of Chris s story a story that moved me immenselyI always presumed Jon Krakauer s book would be some huge epic but was surprised on finding out it s a little over 200 pages I simply had to read it just don t Un Cadeau pour ma Femme know why it took me so long It s going to be difficult to review this without making my own thoughts on Chrisnown first Although it isn t as straightforward as this taking everything into consideration if there is to be a camp criticism and a camp McCandless then I firmly sit with McCandless He was an awe inspiring bright young man who simply broke free from the establishment to follow his own path a path going by both book and film that was simply stunning I now there are people that criticized his adventure as reckless stupid dangerous and well uneuipped for the treacherous landscape of wild Alaska and were even angry with him that he deserved what was coming to him disrespecting nature Let s not forget something he probably died a slow agonizing death that you wouldn t wish on anybody why the anger from people who didn t even now him it was nobody else s business what Chris chose to undertake As the old saying goes it s a free country And he was just that freeI do feel for his family of course I can t begin to imagine the pain and anguish they would have had to injure and the fact he didn t try to contact his sister Karine who he was dearly close to was strange I just hope his family came to eventually realize that the two years Chris spent on the road he would have been immensely happy That s got to count for something Had he gone on to work no doubt well paid work you get the impression he just wouldn t want to be there Had Chris been some wacko or mentally incapacitated person I would have taken far pity over his story but he wasn t he was highly intelligent and new exactly what he was doing That s why although he came to a sad end I am still on the whole happy for the guyThe strongest parts of the book for me are actually not the last months in Alaska which had to be recreated based on Chris diary and the evidence found at the site of his death but the memories of people whom Chris had met on his travels with whom he had caught rides worked and stayed struck up friendships I was especially moved by the generosity of strangers and by Chris s run in with 81 year old Ron Franz whom he managed to convince to give up the monotonous life and take up adventure These two years of traveling had no boundaries no obligations no limitations no expectations Just exploring the land exploring life and himself Jon Krakauer also included memories from his own youth trying to draw comparisons with Chris along with some other historical journey s similar to what McCandless embarked on Chris was a een reader and used literature as a way to inspire him on the road there were uotes from the likes of Leo Tolstoy Jack London Henry David Thoreau and Wallace Stegner that he noted down in his diary these play an important role for any outsider trying to understand just who Chris wasThe book works wonders on different levels it deals with non fiction in a dramatic storytelling way like an adventure novel but also stays as close as possible to the facts and truths recovered from Chris s diary I didn t think his epic story could be condensed down to 200 pages but it works only concentrating on the things that truly matter I was moved to the core Not many books. What would possess a gifted young man recently graduated from college to literally walk away from his life Noted outdoor writer and mountaineer Jon Krakauer tackles that uestion in his reporting on Chris McCandless whose emaciated.
I m afraid the reason most people will read the book and see the new upcoming movie is for a different reason Chris McCandless in the book and from what I understand in the movie is a hero and courageous for flying in the face of everything he grew up with to find a better way A young man unhappy with the materialism hunger and waste in the world angry with his father for not being a perfect father to him intellectually superior a fantastic athlete in top condition and yet a young man who died because of his own decisions and his own actions He cut off ties to his family hitchhiked and worked his way to Alaska headed into the wild in April 1992 and was found dead in August 1992 most probably from starvation How wonderful to fight against the odds and ask real uestions Unfortunately Chris didn t really fight against any odds he took the easy way out by cutting off real relationships Chris may have asked real uestions but he denied real people the opportunity to answer them in any way because he had already decided what was the right way This is not heroic It is immaturity It is tragic and sad yes but not heroic or courageousAfter reading the book I think Chris died because he was foolish Intellectually bright yes Athletically gifted yes But he had no wisdom Wisdom has been defined as skill in living and wisdom is not always bestowed on the young and the healthy and the intellectually smart The opposite of wisdom is foolishness His anger and uestioning drove him not to wisdom but to self reliance and an overweening arrogance in his own ability to get through it Well we see the result of those decisions and those attitudes to uote Darwin Chris is an example of how survival of the fittest applies Chris was not fit therefore he did not survive But why wasn t he fit He was smart and young and gifted in many ways but he chose to abandon relationships and abandon those who loved him and create himself anew with no relationships and no ties He walked away from people who loved him made friends with people who came to love him and walked away from all of that to find his answers in the wild on his own The way away from love and relationship leads not to life but indeed to death And death is what Chris gotThe book uotes Chris mother as saying I haven t prayed since we lost him pg 202 An older man who befriended Chris Ronald Franz also says When Alex left for Alaska I prayed I asked God to Mapapansin Kaya? keep his finger on the shoulder of that one I told him that boy was special But he let Alex die So on December 26 when I learned what had happened I renounced the Lord I withdrew my church membership and became an atheist I decided I couldn t believe in a God who would let something that terrible happen to a boy like Alex pg 60 But God didn t do anything to Chris except let him do as he wanted If Chris sought real answers to his hard uestions God is there and God can help but you have tonow you need help and submit to someone wiser than you Chris McCandless never submitted willingly to anyone and he certainly never admitted anyone else had teaching or wisdom for him He was smarter than everyone else better able to see the truth than anyone else So the heritage Chris McCandless left is one that drives his mother to stop praying and converts an old man to atheism Is this the heritage anyone would wantSo read this book but read it with uestions in mind Why are we lauding a young man as a hero who was actually a foolish man What Buntus Foclora kind of society are we in where real courage and real heroism are somehow playing 2nd fiddle to selfishness and arrogance When are you so intellectually intelligent that you become stupid Is there any time when foolish decisions could be called courageous In a search for truth and what really matters in life is it acceptable to think nothing of hurting those people who are most vulnerable to you When you die will the way you lived your life cause others to abandon their faith or grow in their faith Is it ever courageous to be selfish and think only of yourself Is it harder to walk away from a relationship or to stay in a relationship and work on making it better Would you ever teach anyone else that the way to have real relationships is to limit yourself only to those people who cannot ever hurt youReal courage real heroism comes when you love others and you serve others Real courage has nothing selfish in it Fathers and husbands who remain with their families and provide for them even though they would rather have a mid life crisis and leave it all they are courageous and heroic They remain they work they don t father or husband perfectly but they remain in difficult relationships It courageous to stay in the hard parts of life and try Mothers and wives who sacrifice and serve again and again and again without books being written about them without thanks but who continue to love and give of themselves to others That is courageous It is hard to stay in messy relationships It is easy to leave It is courageous to stay and do hard things It is easy to leave and do what you wantSo let s read this book but read it as a cautionary tale This is what happens when you seemingly have it all but have not love When you die will people be driven to become atheists Will people stop praying when you are dead Or will you live a life of wisdom and love Will you leave behind you a heritage of godly love and service Will people pray because of the example you left them Will they be loving better mothers or fathers or sisters or brothers Or will they become angry and arrogant and foolishness Yes this is a good book to read But let s read it for the right reasons and with the right uestionsNOTE In the book and in the movie the author proposes that Chris ate some poison berries which caused his death But tests have been made around the area and plants that would have been available to Chris were tested and no toxic berries or plants have been found The truth is probably that he starved Too few calories coming in high expenditure of calories for hunting andeeping warm resulted eventually in such a calorie deficit that he died Some good articles I found on Chris McCandless include Park Ranger Peter Christian wrote I am exposed continually to what I will call the McCandless Phenomenon People nearly always young men come to Alaska to challenge themselves against an unforgiving wilderness landscape where convenience of access and possibility of rescue are practically nonexistent When you consider McCandless from my perspective you uickly see that what he did wasn t even particularly daring just stupid tragic and inconsiderate First off he spent very little time learning how to actually live in the wild He arrived at the Stampede Trail without even a map of the area If he had had a good map he could have walked out of his predicament Essentially Chris McCandless committed suicide 18 Some may argue that this is what he wanted all along given his troubled pastAn update as of Sept 2013 as to how McCandless died See which documents the poison contained in wild potato seeds Consuming these seeds introduces a neurotoxin into the body which results in lathyrism This condition causes gradual paralysis which ultimately made McCandless very weak unable to stand or walk and thus unable to forage or hunt for food okay lets address the elephant on goodreads which is the common theme of essentially bashing chris mccandless in reviews i have seen so many ranting about how irresponsible and selfish and arrogant and unprepared he was and i mean theyre not wrong but that honestly has nothing to do with the book what i love most about this is how objective Life at the End of thevTunnel krakauer is he neither praises nor critiues mccandless but presents the facts regarding an unfortunate event in a very interesting and fascinating way which leads me to believe that many people did not understand the nature of this bookyes mccandless thought so highly of himself that he literally went out into the alaskan wilderness euipped with only a plant guide and felt confident that he could survive yes he ignored the number one rule of boys scouts to be prepared yes he only thought about how his actions affected himself but man the manner in whichrakauer tells chris story is so gripping that i couldnt help but get invested in everything that happened this book reads like a true crime story but where the only crime committed was a serious lack of judgement by a very misguided individual so it seems massively unfair to penalise the book itself because of disagreeing with what a young man did but hey to each their own 4 stars I love Jon Krakauer I didn t find one single thing about the Alex McCandless even remotely interesting He came across as a spoiled brat with no concept of reality basically because of his priveleged upbringing But somehow he blamed his parents for that void of myopic self absorption I live in Alaska and I ve lived in Idaho and Colorado and Oregon basically AROUND people who love the great outdoors I am comfortable in a heated coffee shop READING about the great outdoors Still I now that heading into any forest particularly one at that latitude and altitude in pursuit of adventure with a no food b no gear c no plan and d no backup plan is nothing short of delusional or maybe just stupidI absolutely adore Jon Krakauer s attempts to explain Alex s possible motives and angst I get that Krakauer identifies with some of what gnawed at Alex that discontent that feeling that life can t possibly be this pointless etc I wonder about those things with fairly consistent freuency I suppose I have my own means of stamping those feelings out alternating burst of extreme carbohydrate consumption and running or spinning work and volunteerism Still the fact that Alex died of exposure in an abandoned bus in Denali National Park is less poignant than poetic justice that is Darwinism if you want to be cruel Cringe That sounded really awful didn t it But Krakauer carefully paints a picture of a young man completely disillusioned with the life that his parents provided for him the future they groomed him for A life easier better than theirs He points to his parents mistakes and flaws as lightening rods for Alex s rejection of them and his pursuit of deeper understanding What a luxury One that we all pursue at some point in our lives and if we have any sense grow out of I was constantly irritated with Alex for hitching homelessness biting every hand that tried to feed him His lonely desperate death not at all surprising and not terribly sad either except for what it put his family through I had no interest in seeing the movie I saw trailer images of a young man looking off into the wildnerness with depth and intensity and that is NOT the Alex McCandless I got to now in the book If Sean Penn managed to paint a enlightened image of Alex then he deviated from the book uite a bit Into the Wild Jon KrakauerInto the Wild is a 1996 non fiction book written by Jon Krakauer The book was adapted to film in 2007 directed by Sean Penn with Emile Hirsch starring as McCandless Christopher Johnson McCandless 1968 1992 a young and wise man left his family and friends and headed off into the wilderness Into the Wild addresses the issues of how to be accepted into society and how finding oneself sometimes conflicts with being an active member in society Most critics agree that Chris McCandless left to find some sort of enlightenment He also tries to find his way in the wild with minimal material possessions because it made the journey enjoyable His extreme risk taking was the hubris which eve. Gers of heading into the wilderness alone Krakauer whose own adventures have taken him to the perilous heights of Everest provides some answers by exploring the pull the outdoors seductive yet often dangerous has had on his own lif.
BOOK Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer – dedelicate.com
Jon Krakauer is an American writer and mountaineer well known for outdoor and mountain climbing writinghttpswwwfacebookcomjonkrakauer